Vox Populi

Editor: The proposed future development of the remaining lands belonging to Three Sisters Mountain Village ULC – In Receivership (TSMV) has generated a great deal of emotional discussion and debate in Canmore over the past several months.

Editor: If Banff Town council’s goal is to merely enrich the Town’s coffers, increase rather than decrease traffic chaos and alienate visitors and residents alike, then introduce pay parking.

Editor: I have often admired those people who took the time to voice their opinion, give thanks, offer constructive suggestions or had something monumental to say through a letter to the editor.

Editor: My letter regards money. My mother told me (a lifetime ago) many times “money does not grow on trees.

Editor: A massive, prestige-boosting multiplex centre has been built in Canmore so that we can recreate safely indoors without the risk of running into some nasty animal predators.

Editor: Those who read the article “Council hears review of impact statement” in the April 4 Rocky Mountain Outlook (p.

Editor: Three Sisters Development: The proposed Three Sisters Development needs to be scaled down. Regardless of the allowable density to full build-out, it doesn’t follow that it is in the best interests of this mountain community or the Bow Valley.

Editor: We are horrified by Parks Canada’s wanton destruction of so-called ‘dangerous trees’ in the Cascade Gardens and elsewhere.

Editor: Canmore generally looks forward to environmental assessments to help clarify the impacts of proposed developments.

Editor: How many more buildings and people can fit into our narrow, ecologically-sensitive mountain valley before causing serious environmental damage? Specifically, how much more development can occur at Three Sisters before we risk killing the goos